Protect Lakeville Preserving Our Land, Water, Wildlife & Community

Transportation

Train Noise, Horns & Livability

What a freight addition to the existing passenger corridor would mean for noise, vibration, and livability.

60-Second Summary

  • A rail-served aggregate operation would add freight movements, switching, and railcar handling to a corridor that already carries passenger service.
  • Published research links added horn-noise exposure to measurable property-value effects in at least one U.S. case study.
  • Existing residents already report hearing passenger trains early in the morning and late at night — this is a Resident Observation, not a government noise measurement.
Potential ImpactResident ObservationRequires Determination

Take Action

Help Protect Lakeville

Add your name to the petition asking the Lakeville Select Board to deny and not approve the earth-work permit for the proposed 30 Howland Road earth-removal operation as presently proposed.

3Verified Signatures Requesting Non-Approval
Sign the Petition

Why This Matters in Lakeville

What a freight addition to the existing passenger corridor would mean for noise, vibration, and livability.

What Is Known

Potential Impact

What a freight addition could mean

  • Additional gate-down events and roadway queues at the three public crossings
  • Potentially longer crossing-occupancy time from long, slower-moving blocks of heavy hopper cars
  • More horn exposure at crossings a Quiet Zone does not fully eliminate
  • New noise sources not present today — coupling, switching, and stationary siding activity
  • Ground-borne vibration, which published engineering literature identifies as a recurring concern near rail corridors
  • Additional diesel-locomotive and material-handling emissions

Key sources

  1. South Coast Rail Information — three Lakeville crossings (Leonard Street, North Precinct Street, Malbone Street); Quiet Zone review — Town of Lakeville (live document — verify current version)
  2. South Coast Rail Quiet Zone Report — approx. 30 trains/day, speeds up to 79 mph, FRA horn requirements — VHB, prepared for the Town of Lakeville, 2025
  3. Noise Measurement Handbook — rail horns, grade-crossing noise, daytime/nighttime variables — Federal Highway Administration
  4. Connolly, Marecki, Kouroussis, Thalassinakis & Woodward — "The growth of railway ground vibration problems — A review" — confirms ground-borne rail vibration is linked to human annoyance and to reduced real-estate property values — Science of the Total Environment, vol. 568 (2016; epub 2015, per PubMed), 2015Independently re-verified during this site's Sept. 4, 2026 factual audit via a university repository copy (PubMed itself returned a bot-verification page to automated fetching). Full author list, journal, and volume confirmed; the abstract explicitly lists both "human exposure-annoyance" and "real estate values, property price reduction" as key topics, supporting this site's general (non-numeric) use of this citation.
View full source library →
Potential Impact

Property-value literature on horn noise

A U.S. train-horn case study (Transportation Research Part D, 2006) found an average property-value reduction of about 4.1% per 10 dB of added horn-noise exposure in that study area. Effect size varies by location, rail type, distance, and market conditions — this is not a Lakeville-specific forecast.

Key sources

  1. Bellinger — "The Economic Valuation of Train Horn Noise: A US Case Study" — residential values fall about 4.1% (approx. $4,800 in the study area) per 10 dB of added horn-noise exposure — Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (2006), 2006Independently re-verified during this site's Sept. 4, 2026 factual audit (ScienceDirect blocks automated fetching; confirmed via a secondary academic index citing the paper's abstract). Author, journal, year, and the 4.1%-per-10dB figure all match this site's existing citation exactly.
View full source library →
Resident Observation

Resident-reported noise

Residents near the corridor report hearing trains during early-morning and late-evening hours. This is a firsthand local observation, not an independently measured government finding.

Key sources

  1. "Lakeville tracks down solutions to train noise issue" — confirms ~30 trains/day up to 79 mph through Lakeville and resident noise complaints — Nemasket Week, 2025URL corrected and figure independently re-confirmed during this site's Sept. 4, 2026 factual audit.
View full source library →
Requires Determination

What Has Not Yet Been Established

  • Exact freight movement counts and timing, including any night or early-morning windows
  • A cumulative noise and vibration study layering proposed freight onto the existing passenger baseline
  • A Lakeville-specific property-value analysis

Related Pages

Sources

Key sources

  1. South Coast Rail Information — three Lakeville crossings (Leonard Street, North Precinct Street, Malbone Street); Quiet Zone review — Town of Lakeville (live document — verify current version)
  2. South Coast Rail Quiet Zone Report — approx. 30 trains/day, speeds up to 79 mph, FRA horn requirements — VHB, prepared for the Town of Lakeville, 2025
  3. "Lakeville tracks down solutions to train noise issue" — confirms ~30 trains/day up to 79 mph through Lakeville and resident noise complaints — Nemasket Week, 2025URL corrected and figure independently re-confirmed during this site's Sept. 4, 2026 factual audit.
  4. Bellinger — "The Economic Valuation of Train Horn Noise: A US Case Study" — residential values fall about 4.1% (approx. $4,800 in the study area) per 10 dB of added horn-noise exposure — Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (2006), 2006Independently re-verified during this site's Sept. 4, 2026 factual audit (ScienceDirect blocks automated fetching; confirmed via a secondary academic index citing the paper's abstract). Author, journal, year, and the 4.1%-per-10dB figure all match this site's existing citation exactly.
View full source library →